Megan MarkleThe estranged father Thomas It was reported that what drove him to fame Leaking a private message from his daughter to the press.
In 2019, the 76-year-old Thomas allowed his daughter to post a private message in the Mail on Sunday and on the MailOnline website after tensions escalated between him and his daughter.
Megan, 39, is now suing Associated Newspapers for Infringement of privacy and infringement of copyright On the five articles that included parts of the handwritten letter.
Now, nearly two years after the correspondence was published, Thomas has explained exactly why he felt the need to make the letter public.
The former TV lighting director in court said he felt “slandered” by an article in People magazine, according to a witness testimony obtained by E! News.
“When I read the article” The Truth About Megan “in People magazine, I was shocked by what was said about me, the statement said. “It was a complete lie. I misrepresented the tone and content of the letter Meg wrote in August 2018 and I quickly decided I wanted to correct this misrepresentation.”
On February 6, 2019, People published an article titled “The Truth About Meghan Markle’s Father – And The Message She Written To Him After The Wedding,” which includes an “Old Friend.” The face of the messageClaiming that she is “sad” to hear about her father’s health scare, and wrote to him to tell him that she loves him and wants to “fix” their relationship.
The article indicated that Megan “loved me and she wants to fix our relationship,” Thomas said. Nevertheless, he felt the message “was critical.”
He explained, “It was a signal to the end of our relationship, not reconciliation.” Duchess‘ the father.
In the People magazine article, the friend claims that Thomas suggested taking a picture with his daughter in response to her letter, which Megan felt was inconsistent with what she told him in her first letter, when she told her father that she wasn’t. “You want to communicate through the media.”
However, Thomas said he was instead proposing a “rhythmic” image of himself with Megan, and he felt it would “make the press take a hold”.
In addition, Thomas refutes the friend’s claim that he “never contacted” his daughter after the ordeal. Thomas reportedly claimed in court that he had “found no way to get her to speak to me”.
Allowing the Daily Mail to “actually quote and reproduce” the message was the only way to tell its side of the story.
Thomas said: “The text of the letter proves that what was said in People magazine about the message was wrong.” “It” resolves “what was said about me in that article. The readers had to see the message for themselves – then they would know they understood the truth.
He also said his choice is to publish only parts of the message.
“I did not want the message to be published in its entirety,” he said. “The reason for this is because I thought the message as a whole made Meg look terrible. I don’t want to attack her or hurt her.”
Megan’s lawyers have them It said She denied that the Duchess of Sussex was aware of the People’s article prior to its publication.
However, in documents publicly available in Britain, Meghan’s legal team insists the letter was an example of “royal begging.” [Thomas] To stop talking to the press. “
“Writing a personal letter to a close family member, lover, or friend inevitably places the writer in an unwarranted and possibly vulnerable position because the words chosen and the way in which the writer chooses to express himself is For The recipient and no one else, “the documents said.
Representatives of Thomas and Associated Newspapers and People did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment.